You might end up thanking that nail sincerely
Rear tyre indeed needed replaced: it could have been plugged but Cupar don't reccommend it - £117 duly handed over for a V rated Anakee.
Going by everyone & their dog raving about them, I should be wondering how the bike ever worked before now...
Reality has a habit of being different from aspirations but this time, at least so far, it's running along the same lines.
I'm just at the end of the 100 mile run in period and I'm pretty impressed so far. Grip feels reasonable but I've obviously yet to explore it further than sensible. I see a post above about them tending to continue to bank: I was aware a couple of times of having to catch it in the latter parts of corners as the bike felt like it wanted to keep going round. The Bridgestone had only done 2k and was still pretty well rounded so there isn't a great square old v's round new argument to it. I'm keeping my mind open until it's done a few more miles and it's been out to the edge.
In the meantime I decided to take a few measurements to see if there's anything significant: the profile of the Anakee looked a little flatter and the tape seems to confirm this. The sidewalls are around 5mm higher on the Ana and the total tread profile is 2mm less as well.
No wonder they quote 29% minimum more mileage out of them: the tread gauge is at least 50% deeper than the TW (7.6 - 8.0mm compared to 4.8 - 5mm)