Does it matter what the dealer is doing? Are you expecting to have the oil changed? 
You think Suzuki are being kind?
They have had to recall because there was an unacceptable number of units failing, showing that the part was not up to standards or fit for purpose.
Wonder if you'd say the same if you were one of the people that fell victim to a failing stator and were left stranded and out of pocket considerably to rectify the fault before it became known as a faulty part?
Would you say the same if it was a brake recall with a safety aspect and just play the law of averages that it won't affect you?
I certainly wouldn't have been happy if mine had failed on my tour of Belgium and Luxembourg last year and left me stranded.
I know any part can fail and cause a breakdown but if it was a result of a high failure rate part and Suzuki hadn't recalled it!
Regarding changing the oil, as the stator is oil bathed do you think it would be good practice from manufacturer to recall and fit a new part and either keep or put old oil back in the engine?
There are specific procedures to follow for workshop jobs that as an authorised dealer should be up to factory standards, and keeping or putting old oil back in an engine is not one of them, neither is tipping the bike over to save most of the old oil and topping it up as some other posters have reported the dealer is intending.
If your happy with the work that was done on yours then good for you but don't think others are on the lamb for wanting the job done as Suzuki say it should be done.
